Balance Scale Model

  • This model aims to assist practitioners in understanding decision-making process of people with stroke in community participation. It is depicted as a scale with the fulcrum in the middle, with the facilitators and barriers placed on either end with different amount of the impacts (factors placed further from center represents higher impact on decision making). The balance scale represents the concept of weighting thought, desire, or request for going out into the community that from oneself, caregiver, or significant others. Left side of the fulcrum, supporting community participation, includes personal contextual and environmental facilitators. These factors are weighted against the right side of the fulcrum, barriers to community participation, which includes environmental and personal barriers, impairments in body function and structures, and activity limitations including dependence factors. When the factors on the left side of the fulcrum outweigh the factors on the right side, the client decides to go out into the community. Personal facilitators, e.g., the feeling of well-being during engagement in community activities or continuance of a social role/activity, positively affect the decision making more than environmental facilitators, e.g., wheelchair accessibility. As the clients usually adjust their participation in places with fewer environmental and personal barriers, this factor is placed nearer to the center than other factors. Impairment in body function and structure, such as altered body functions, perceptual deficit, decreased sitting tolerance, would weigh heavily against community participation if the anticipated trip requires long time or effort. Dependence issues, due to activity limitation, are positioned farthest away from the fulcrum, as the clients are conscious that going out increases caregiver burden. Occupational therapists, and other health professionals, prescribe wheelchair, and powered mobility devices to facilitate community participation, and to increase independence, freedom, and continuity of life for people with stroke.

Summarized by

  • Macey Cho

Type

  • Model (conceptual)

Population

  • Adult
  • Elderly

Disability

  • Neurological disorder

Domain of occupation

  • IADL
  • Work
  • Leisure

Application Note

  • This model aims to facilitate practitioners’ understanding in factors affecting community participation among stroke survivors.

Key Reference

  • Barker, D., Reid, D., & Cott, C. (2006). The experience of senior stroke survivors: Factors in community participation among wheelchair users. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 73(1), 18-25.

Year Published

  • 2006

Primary Developer

  • Donna J. Barker

Primary Developer Email

  • donna.barker@utoronto.ca

Related Models

A Conceptual Model of Occupational Therapy in Low Vision

  • This model suggests that occupational therapists working with older adults with low vision should extend beyond compensatory techniques (e.g., modifying physical environmental and providing technology) to the community for social integration. Occupational therapists can accompany clients to nearby grocery stores, places of worship and community centers. Occupational therapists can also make recommendation to owners to eliminate environmental barriers and encourage clients to self-advocate.

Compensatory Frame of Reference

  • The compensatory frame of reference (FOR) aims to increase occupational performance and facilitate independence by utilizing compensatory techniques. It is used to compensate dysfunction in desired occupations, e.g., using assistive device or equipment such as Ergonon/Reflex knife during meal preparation, to compensate difficulty with using traditional knife. This FOR also includes environmental change, e.g., altering layout of living environment or using splints.

Canadian Occupational Therapy Inter-relational Practice Process (COTIPP) Framework

  • The Canadian Occupational Therapy Inter-relational Practice Process (COTIPP) Framework, drawn from previous Canadian practice frameworks (i.e., the CPPF and CMCE), aims to describe the collaborative, inter-relational, and rights-based practice of occupational therapy. The COTIPP places ‘build and sustain relationship’ in the centre of the framework, indicating as the essential underlying process of occupational therapy practice. The outer edge of the framework contains an additional three foundational process that occupational therapists engage in throughout practice.

Data Driven Decision Making Framework (DDDM)

  • Data Driven Decision Making (DDDM) is a framework for therapists to implement clinical reasoning within occupational therapy process and has a focus on the use of observation, testing and intervention results to guide and measure outcomes. This framework consists of 11 steps. Step 1, the therapists have to identify the participation challenges and goals. In step 2, therapists need to describe the level of the client’s functioning in each part of the body or the brain.

Occupation-specific Community Development Model for Family Mental Health

  • This model consists of a continuum with five steps, each facilitating change for subsequent stages of mental health in families that are socially isolated. The five steps are (1) developmental casework, (2) mutual support, (3) coalitions of mutual interest, (4) pro-active community participation, and (5) social movements. Development casework is an individual therapy focusing on occupational behavior and role acquisition through participating in daily activities.

Model Type

Population

Disability

Domain of Occupation

  • © 2024 HOTheory - All rights reserved.